Maturity model-based software process quality assessment and management

Authors

  • Владимир Анатольевич Шеховцов НТУ«ХПИ» ул. Фрунзе 21 Харьков, Украина, 61002, Ukraine
  • Михаил Дмитриевич Годлевский НТУ «ХПИ» ул. Фрунзе 21 Харьков, Украина, 61002, Ukraine
  • Игорь Львович Брагинский НТУ «ХПИ» ул. Фрунзе 21 Харьков, Украина, 61002, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2011.1172

Keywords:

Quality improvement, maturity model

Abstract

We propose to formulate the problem of achieving the necessary level of maturity for the software process based on the selection among alternate variants of the process steps implementation under the resource constraints of the organization

Author Biographies

Владимир Анатольевич Шеховцов, НТУ«ХПИ» ул. Фрунзе 21 Харьков, Украина, 61002

Кандидат технических наук, доцент.

Кафедра автоматизированных систем управления

Михаил Дмитриевич Годлевский, НТУ «ХПИ» ул. Фрунзе 21 Харьков, Украина, 61002

Доктор технических наук, професор, заведующий кафедрой

Кафедра автоматизированных систем управления

Игорь Львович Брагинский, НТУ «ХПИ» ул. Фрунзе 21 Харьков, Украина, 61002

Аспирант

Кафедра  автоматизированных систем управления

References

  1. Humphrey W.S. Managing the software process / W.S. Humphrey. – Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley. – 1989.
  2. Humphrey W.S. The Software Engineering Process: Definition and Scope / W.S. Humphrey // ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. – 1989. – Vol. 14. – N 4. – P. 82-83.
  3. Software Engineering — Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK), ISO/IEC TR 19759:2005. ISO. – 2005. – 173 p.
  4. Лавріщева К.М. Програмна інженерія / К.М. Лавріщева. – К: Академперіодика. – 2008. – 319 с.
  5. Madachy R.J. Software process dynamics / R.J. Madachy. – Hoboken, NJ: IEEE Press - Wiley Inter-science. – 2008. – 601 p.
  6. Scacchi W. Process models in software engineering / W. Scacchi // J.Marciniak (ed.) Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, 2nd edition. – New York: John Wiley & Sons. – 2001.
  7. ISO/IEC 12207:2008, Information technology – Software life cycle processes. International Organization for Standardization. – 2008. – 122 p.
  8. Оценка и аттестация зрелости процессов создания и сопровождения проrраммных средств и информационных систем. М: Книга. – 2001. – 348 с.
  9. Boehm B. W. Software engineering / B.W. Boehm // IEEE Transactions on Computers. – 1976. – Vol. 25. – N 12. – P. 1226–1241.
  10. Boehm B.W. A spiral model of software development and enhancement / B.W. Boehm // IEEE Software. – 1988. – Vol. 21. – N 5. – P. 61-72.
  11. Larman K. Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide / C. Larman. – Addison Wesley –2003. – 368 p.
  12. Крачтен Ф. Введение в Rational Unified Process / Ф. Крачтен. – К: Вильямс. – 2002. – 240 с.
  13. Schwaber K. Agile Software Development with Scrum / K. Schwaber. – Prentice Hall,. – 2001. – 158 p.
  14. Persse J.R. Process Improvement Essentials / J.R. Persse. – O'Reilly. – 2006.
  15. Mutafelija, B. Process improvement with CMMI v1.2 and ISO standards / B. Mutafelija. – Auerbach Pubs. – 2009.
  16. Шубенкова Е.В. Тотальное управление качеством / Е.В. Шубенкова. – М: XXI. – 2005. – 252 с.
  17. E.Y. Li. Total Quality Management in Software Development Process / E.Y. Li, H.-G. Chen, W. Cheung // The Journal of Quality Assurance Institute. – 2000. – Vol. 14. – N 1. – P. 4-6, 35-41.
  18. Schlickman J. ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management System Design / J. Schlickman. – Artech House. – 2003.
  19. Chrissis M.B. CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement / M.B. Chrissis, M. Konrad, – Addison-Wesley. – 2003. – 688 p.
  20. Motorola. Motorola University Six Sigma Arti-cles [Електронний ресурс] / Motorola. –. – 2006. – Режим доступу: http://www.motorola.com.
  21. van Steenbergen M. An Instrument for the Development of the Enterprise Architecture Practice / M. van Steenbergen, M. van den Berg, S. Brinkkemper // Proc. ICEIS'2007. –, Vol. 3. – 2007. – P. 14-22.
  22. P.V. Martins. ProPAM: SPI based on Process and Project Alignment / P.V. Martins, A.R.d. Silva // IRMA Internacional Conference. – 2007.
  23. M. van Steenbergen. The Design of Focus Area Maturity Models / M. van Steenbergen, R. Bos, S. Brinkkemper, et al. – 2010.
  24. J. Becker. Developing Maturity Models for IT Management – A Procedure Model and its Application / J. Becker, R. Knackstedt, J. Pöppelbuß // Business & Information Systems Engineering. – 2009. – N 3.
  25. A.M. Maier. Developing maturity grids for assessing organisational capabilities: Practitioner guidance / A.M. Maier, J. Moultrie, P.J. Clarkson. – 2009.
  26. C.P.Halvorsen. A Taxonomy to Compare SPI Frameworks / C.P. Halvorsen, R. Conradi. – 2002.
  27. P. Martins. A comparative study of SPI Approaches with ProPAM / P.V. Martins //. – 2006.
  28. S. Komi-Sirviö. Development and Evaluation of Software Process Improvement Methods, PhD Diss. / S. Komi-Sirviö. – VTT Electronics. – 2004. – 190 p.
  29. T. de Bruin. Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model / T.d. Bruin, R. Freeze, U. Kulkarni, M. Rosemann // ACIS 2005 Proceedings. – 2005.
  30. W. Bekkers. SPM maturity matrix, Technical Report UUCS-2010-013 / W. Bekkers, I.v.d. Weerd. – Utrecht University. – 2010.
  31. Brinkkemper S. Process Improvement in Requirements Management: A Method Engineering Approach / S. Brinkkemper, I. van de Weerd, M. Saek // REFSQ'08. – LNCS, Vol. 5025. – 2008. – P. 6-22.
  32. Goeken M. IT Governance Frameworks as Methods / M. Goeken, S. Alter // Proc. ICEIS 2008. –, Vol. 32. – 2008. – P. 331-338.
  33. van de Weerd I. A product software knowledge infrastructure for situational capability maturation: Vision and case studies in product management / I. van de Weerd, J. Versendaal, S. Brinkkemper // Proc. REFSQ'06. – 2006. – P. 97–112.
  34. T. Mettler. Situational Maturity Models as Instrumental Artifacts for Organizational Design / T. Mettler, P. Rohner // Proc. DESRIST'09. – ACM Press. – 2009.
  35. S.-J. Huang. Selection priority of process areas based on CMMI continuous representation / S.-J. Huang, W.-M. Han // Information & Management –2006. – Vol. 43 –P. 297–307.

Downloads

How to Cite

Шеховцов, В. А., Годлевский, М. Д., & Брагинский, И. Л. (2011). Maturity model-based software process quality assessment and management. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(2(53), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2011.1172

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2(53) (2011): Information technology

Section

Information technology

License

Copyright (c) 2014 Владимир Анатольевич Шеховцов, Михаил Дмитриевич Годлевский, Игорь Львович Брагинский

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.